RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01113
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His initial enlistment grade be changed to Airman First Class
(A1C, E-3) versus Airman Basic (AB, E-1).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Based upon him having his bachelors degree, he should have
enlisted as an E-3 instead of an E-1.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to the applicants DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment
Document, on 26 Feb 92, he entered active duty in the Regular
Air Force in the grade of E-1.
According to the applicants AF Form 3005, Guaranteed Aptitude
Area Enlistment Agreement Non-Prior Service United States
Air Force, on 26 Feb 92, he accepted the terms of his
enlistment agreement indicating that he was enlisting for four
years in the grade of E-1.
According to Special Order AC-011049, dated 1 May 14, the
applicant will retire from active duty, effective 1 Feb 15, in
the grade of Master Sergeant (MSgt, E-7).
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPE recommends approval indicating there appears to be
an error or injustice in determining the applicants initial
grade/rank upon entry onto active duty. The applicant provided
college transcripts indicating he completed 125 semester hours
from calendar year 1985 through 1990. In accordance with Air
Force Recruiting Service Instruction (AFRSI) 36-2001, Table
2.1., Enlistment Grade Determination and Factors, Rule 10,
members who have satisfactorily completed 45 semester hours or
67 quarter hours of credit from an accredited, degree-granting
institution listed in the applicable AIPE directory for last
year attended will enlist under the pay grade E-3/A1C.
The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of supplemental consideration for
promotion to the grade of Staff Sergeant (SSgt) indicating the
added points are not sufficient enough as to render him a
select for any previous cycle. However, should the Board agree
with AFPC/DPSIPEs recommendation to correct the applicants
initial entry rank to reflect A1C, they recommend the
applicants Senior Airman (SrA) Date of Rank (DOR) be corrected
to reflect 26 Jun 94.
Based on the recommended adjusted/corrected A1C DOR, the
applicants DOR to the grade of SrA should be corrected to
reflect 26 Jun 94 (28 months Time-in-Grade (TIG)).
Based on the applicants 26 Feb 95 DOR to the grade of SrA, the
first time he was considered for promotion to SSgt was cycle
96A5. With the correction to his SrA DOR, he would have been
eligible for promotion consideration in the 95E5 promotion
cycle. His test scores from the 96E5 cycle would be applied
retroactively and his total score would have been 215.20. The
score required for promotion selection was 295.78.
The applicant would have received four additional points toward
TIG for all previous promotion cycles (96E5, 97E5 and 98E5).
He missed promotion by more than four points on all previous
cycles.
The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 1 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit E).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case and agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale expressed as the basis
for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of
either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the
applicant's records be corrected as indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 26 Feb 92, he enlisted in the Regular Air Force in
the pay grade of E-3 for a period of four years.
b. He was promoted to the grade of senior airman (E-4),
effective and with a date of rank of 26 Jun 94, instead of
26 Feb 95.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01113 in Executive Session on 14 Jan 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Mar 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 27 Mar 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 6 Jun 14
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Aug 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02668
This TIG error prevented him from testing for MSgt in 2011 and 2012, and denied him consideration for promotion on both the FY11 and FY12 Master Sergeant Selection Boards. After a thorough review of his RegAF and ANG records, it is determined the applicant did not hold the rank of TSgt while serving in the RegAF and therefore, this DOR is equal to the date of his enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03312
His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Airman First Class (A1C) be corrected to 31 Jul 2001 (Administratively Corrected). In a letter dated 10 Jan 2014, AFPC/DPSOE advised the applicant his DOR to the grades of SrA, SSgt, TSgt and MSgt were administratively corrected and that he would receive supplemental promotion consideration for promotion to the grade of SMSgt during the May 2014 Senior Noncommissioned Officer (SNCO) Supplemental Promotion Board. After a thorough review of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03355
Based on the applicant’s DOR as a SrA of 13 June 1992, the first time he was considered for promotion to the grade of SSgt was cycle 94A5. The AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In an undated letter, the applicant reiterated his contention that based on Air Force Pamphlet 36-2241, paragraph 15.41.2.SrA, which states that A1Cs are promoted to SrA with either 36 months TIS and 20...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00075
If the applicant had not been court-martialed and reduced to the grade of AB, he would have been promoted to the grade of SRA on 16 Feb 04, provided there were no ineligibility conditions and he had the recommendation of his commander. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPWB notes the applicant’s incorrect promotion to airman and A1C and provides details regarding the applicant’s promotion eligibility and the pertinent DORs based on various circumstances. A...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05395
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05395 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Airman First Class (A1C, E-3) of 1 Nov 12 be changed to match his Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) of 18 Jun 11. His TAFMSD was adjusted to 18 Jun 11, to account for his reserve time and his...
Since filing his appeal, he has been promoted to the grade of SRA with a DOR of 15 Feb 01. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this appeal are contained in the applicant’s military records (Exhibit B), and the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force (Exhibits C, D and E). TEDDY L. HOUSTON Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-02866 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00264
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00264 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. As a result of the failed FAs, his projected promotion to the grade of SSgt was cancelled and he received a referral EPR. Although DPSOE initially recommended denial of the applicants request to be supplementally considered for promotion to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00825
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2011-00825 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He successfully completed the RTDP and was returned to duty in the grade of A1C with a date of rank and effective date of 21 May 2010. DPSOE states that while the applicant has successfully completed the RTDP and provided several letters in...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02447
These options were documented and identified to the applicant by his WBFMP manager and commander. ________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02437
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02437 INDEX CODE: 131.05 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of rank (DOR) to Staff Sergeant (SSgt) (E-5) be changed to 1 December 1999 and her DOR to Senior Airman (SrA) (E-4) be changed to 5 October 1995. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...